John Cassian’s Three Renunciations

As a text written for monks,  John Cassian’s Conferences often feels a bit harsh if not extreme to me, as a secular reader here in the twentieth century. But even so, there are still surprisingly relevant treasures hidden within this 1600-year-old text. The third conference, called The Three Renunciations, includes this tantalizing insight, in which Cassian considers three renunciations essential to the vocation of a monk: to illustrate, he quotes Genesis 12:1′s description of Abraham’s renunciations as he seeks to live into his calling:

‘Come away from  your native land and from your family and from the house of your father.’

Cassian sees “native land” as symbolic of renouncing worldly wealth, while “family” suggests renouncing identity and “house of your father” implies renouncing “all worldly memory arising before our eyes.”

But I see another way of understanding these three renunciations: in light of Ken Wilber’s theories of the evolution of consciousness. In terms of moral development, Wilber speaks of consciousness moving from egocentric (“it’s all about me”) to ethnocentric (“my tribe is good, all others are evil”) to worldcentric (universal care and compassion). Ultimately, as consciousness traverses into transpersonal realms, even worldcentric consciousness is transcended. Now, the point is not so much that we renounce early modes of consciousness as we evolve, but it is important that we differentiate from an earlier stage in order to identify with a higher/later stage. Perhaps Cassian’s renunciations are not unlike what a psychologically savvy spiritual guide would mean today when talking about differentiation. And these three differentiations are indeed important: to transcend the egocentric (leaving behind the self-centered will to power), and then transcend the ethnocentric (leaving behind identification with the tribe), and ultimately even leaving behind the world-centric (disidentifying with the manifest realm in order to embrace the transpersonal dimensions). And this seems mighty similar to Cassian’s three renunciations of worldly wealth (the ego’s acquisitiveness), family and identity (the ethnocentric self) and finally even the “house of the father” — or the manifest realm itself.

111 Mystics Update

I fear that I have been remiss in keeping my blog up-to-date in regard to my 111 Mystics Project.

If you’re new to me and my blog, “111 Mystics” refers to a reading list I began about two and a half years ago. Originally it consisted of only seventy-seven mystics, but I’ve added to it a couple of times until it reached its current form. The idea was basically to create a reading list to help me systematically study and prayerfully read the great western mystics. Meanwhile, I intended to use this reading experience as blog-fodder; originally I created a LiveJournal blog exclusively for these posts (I am in the process of archiving all of those old LJ posts on this blog, but if you want to see them in their original habitat, go here). The last mystic I wrote about to any extent was Pseudo-Macarius; since then I have read Augustine and have just recently begun John Cassian. Coming soon: Proclus, Pseudo-Dionysius, St. Benedict…

Creating the mystical bibliography for this blog/website has rejuvenated my interest in the 111 Mystics, so I hope to begin blogging about them again. I’m not going to bother revisiting ol’ Augustine; I’ll just pick up where I am. Stay tuned…

© Copyright www.anamchara.com - Theme by Pexeto