<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Integral Christianity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anamchara.com/2007/07/02/integral-christianity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anamchara.com/2007/07/02/integral-christianity/</link>
	<description>Carl McColman ~ The Fullness of Joy is to Behold God in All</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 17:37:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HealthAndGreenSmoothie</title>
		<link>http://www.anamchara.com/2007/07/02/integral-christianity/#comment-2335</link>
		<dc:creator>HealthAndGreenSmoothie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mccolman.wordpress.com/2007/07/02/integral-christianity/#comment-2335</guid>
		<description>There are so many delicious recipes out there for healthy smoothies. They really do make the world of difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are so many delicious recipes out there for healthy smoothies. They really do make the world of difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl McColman</title>
		<link>http://www.anamchara.com/2007/07/02/integral-christianity/#comment-2334</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl McColman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 18:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mccolman.wordpress.com/2007/07/02/integral-christianity/#comment-2334</guid>
		<description>To answer Jan&#039;s question, I think Wilber&#039;s most important work is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1570627444/earthmystic&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sex, Ecology, Spirituality: The Spirit of Evolution&lt;/a&gt;, but if reading an 800-page tome makes your head spin, start with Wilber&#039;s own summation of that book, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1590304500/earthmystic&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A Brief History of Everything&lt;/a&gt;. I also really like his Sounds True audio series, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1591791243/earthmystic&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Kosmic Consciousness&lt;/a&gt;, although it certainly is a bit pricey. But when you listen to him speak, Wilber comes across as more vulnerable, nay even a bit socially awkward, than is revealed in print. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1590303466/earthmystic&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Integral Spirituality&lt;/a&gt; isn&#039;t bad either, but I&#039;d read the other books I&#039;ve mentioned first, as it is more densely written and isn&#039;t as accessible as ABHOE or SES.Finally, in response to my dear friend Mr. Grizzle: you and I are agreed upon the fact that Wilber&#039;s writing is arrogant, but where I am amused by this fact, you resist it. Clearly, I have accepted my own shadow-arrogance better than you have. Thus, I would suggest you ought to read Wilber for no other reason than it will help to make your own arrogant shadow a bit more, shall we say, &lt;i&gt;humble&lt;/i&gt;!  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To answer Jan&#8217;s question, I think Wilber&#8217;s most important work is <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1570627444/earthmystic" rel="nofollow">Sex, Ecology, Spirituality: The Spirit of Evolution</a>, but if reading an 800-page tome makes your head spin, start with Wilber&#8217;s own summation of that book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1590304500/earthmystic" rel="nofollow">A Brief History of Everything</a>. I also really like his Sounds True audio series, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1591791243/earthmystic" rel="nofollow">Kosmic Consciousness</a>, although it certainly is a bit pricey. But when you listen to him speak, Wilber comes across as more vulnerable, nay even a bit socially awkward, than is revealed in print. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1590303466/earthmystic" rel="nofollow">Integral Spirituality</a> isn&#8217;t bad either, but I&#8217;d read the other books I&#8217;ve mentioned first, as it is more densely written and isn&#8217;t as accessible as ABHOE or SES.Finally, in response to my dear friend Mr. Grizzle: you and I are agreed upon the fact that Wilber&#8217;s writing is arrogant, but where I am amused by this fact, you resist it. Clearly, I have accepted my own shadow-arrogance better than you have. Thus, I would suggest you ought to read Wilber for no other reason than it will help to make your own arrogant shadow a bit more, shall we say, <i>humble</i>!  <img src='http://www.anamchara.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell Grizzle</title>
		<link>http://www.anamchara.com/2007/07/02/integral-christianity/#comment-2333</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell Grizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 18:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mccolman.wordpress.com/2007/07/02/integral-christianity/#comment-2333</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...  If Ken Wilber hangs out with Fr. Thomas Keating and quotes Plotinus, I guess he can&#039;t be ALL bad.  

My question (worded sarcastically, but actually a serious question) is:  if I&#039;m already familiar with Keating and Plotinus, what is to be gained from slogging through the dense and obnoxiously self-centered writings of Wilber?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;  If Ken Wilber hangs out with Fr. Thomas Keating and quotes Plotinus, I guess he can&#8217;t be ALL bad.  </p>
<p>My question (worded sarcastically, but actually a serious question) is:  if I&#8217;m already familiar with Keating and Plotinus, what is to be gained from slogging through the dense and obnoxiously self-centered writings of Wilber?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.anamchara.com/2007/07/02/integral-christianity/#comment-2332</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 13:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mccolman.wordpress.com/2007/07/02/integral-christianity/#comment-2332</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this review. Without it, I might have bought the book. With your knowledge of Ken Wilbur, what book would you recommend for me to read next? I devoured &quot;Up from Eden&quot; and have also read &quot;The Atman Project.&quot; You mention other books in your review, and so I would be interested in your opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this review. Without it, I might have bought the book. With your knowledge of Ken Wilbur, what book would you recommend for me to read next? I devoured &#8220;Up from Eden&#8221; and have also read &#8220;The Atman Project.&#8221; You mention other books in your review, and so I would be interested in your opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

