“This user has disabled anonymous and non-friend posting.”

Does anyone who reads this mostly dormant journal know ?

This person has written a lovely comment about a recent post in my blog. I had wanted to post a thank you comment, but am barred from doing so by the fact that I am not listed as one of ‘s friends.

The ironies of the internet, where we can access one another’s thoughts so easily and yet have built gated cybercommunities to keep each other at a safe distance.

At any rate, if anyone could facilitate an introduction between us, I’d be grateful.

Julian (1987-2007)

Julian, March 2004The oldest of our four cats has died.

Julian (yes, named after the English mystic) came to live with me as an adorable calico kitten in the fall of 1987. I had just moved to Atlanta, and I chose an apartment with the ability to have a cat as a consideration. She was rather shy — a classic “scaredy-cat” — but could be very warm and affectionate with you once she decided she liked you.

When I married Fran (in 1993), she and Julian really bonded. For most of her mature years, Julian slept in the bed next to Fran. We have often joked that of our four cats, Julian “owned” Fran, China “owned” me, Clarissa “owned” Rhiannon, and Ferbie, the youngest (like China, a stray who adopted us) was the free agent in the house.

In recent years Julian suffered from arthritis and her self-grooming declined considerably. Which was a shame, as she was always a lovely cat (and for most of her life, fastidious with her grooming, as most cats are). As her grooming declined, her hair would be matted — we nicknamed her “Mattie” and commented that she was our first “Rasta kitten” since she had such wonderful dreadlocks. In an effort to help her with her grooming, Fran bought several cat-combs and we would take turns combing her. Feisty old lady that she was, she would complain loudly and bitterly as we combed out her matted fur. But she never bit and always would come back for more grooming, so we figured that she really was glad to be cared for that way, even if she had to complain about it. She was by far the most vocal of our four cats, the house will be eerily silent without her persistent meowing. I believe she was part-Siamese, and certainly talked like a Siamese cat.

Julian hated closed doors and adored being petted on her head. If we would lie on the bed to read, she knew that if she were persistent in rubbing the book (making reading nigh impossible), she would be rewarded with ample head-petting. She knew how to work us.

This weekend I was in Virginia, visiting my father. Early Sunday morning Fran heard a loud noise and woke up to find Julian lying on the floor, having fallen off the bed. She obviously was having seizures. Eventually the seizures stopped and she spent several hours wandering aimlessly around the house. As Fran described it, it was clear she had suffered a stroke with considerable loss of cognitive function: she would walk into a wall and just stop and stand there, unsure what to do next. At one point she got stuck between the refrigerator and the cabinets, and just stood there until Fran rescued her. Finally she settled down in a corner of our living room and slept; Fran made a little nest for her with towels in a box. We figured that we would probably have to get her to the vet today, since often strokes in cats can be treated with steroids.

But that was not to be. Early this morning — roughly a day after she suffered her stroke — she passed away, peacefully with Fran beside her, gently stroking her.

When I got home, Fran and I groomed her body one final time.

I’m sad and I know I’ll miss her terribly, but she had a good life, over twenty years of it. Fran has a clear sense of her playing in the fields of heaven. I suppose she’s gone to Tir na n’Og, where the mice are plentiful and the hunting is good.

God speed, Julian. Thank you for sharing your life with us.

On the Road Again…

Tomorrow morning, bright and early, I fly to Virginia to visit with my father in my hometown of Hampton. I’ll be there through the weekend and will return to Georgia on Monday. I may or may not have Internet access while I’m up there (I imagine I’ll get my laptop into a wi-fi hotspot at some point, just don’t know when). I’ll be back in Atlanta by noon Monday, and after lunching with an old friend I hope I’ll make it downtown to hear the Dalai Lama speak at Atlanta’s Centennial Park, although my aversion to crowds may win out over my desire to see one of my spiritual heroes.

I should be back in the saddle by Tuesday or Wednesday. Hopefully by then I’ll come up with something nice and spiritual/controversial/thought provoking for you to read.

Praying the Mystics

Maybe the point I’m about to make is an obvious one. Since I am a “bear of little brain,” sometimes obvious ideas aren’t so evident to me. So if this seems like a no-brainer, consider the source…

The idea in question came to me last night. Wouldn’t it make sense when reading the mystics — Julian of Norwich, John of the Cross, Teresa of Avila, Walter Hilton, Hildegard of Bingen, Meister Eckhart, Evelyn Underhill, Gregory Palamas, The Cloud of Unknowing, and so forth — to read them as an act of prayer? Really this is just lectio divina, but perhaps a more compressed approach to lectio: rather than worry about the method of lectio (reading with an openness to receiving the word, and then engaging in meditative reflection, verbal orison, and finally wordless contemplation) just do it — just open the book, and read. Slowly. Begin with “Dear God,” and end with “Amen.” As for the other steps in the lectio process, we simply can be open to the spirit’s leading: sometimes praying the writings of the great mystics will lead naturally to meditation, verbal prayer and contemplation, while other times the reading/praying experience will be full and complete in itself. It’s all about just being open to the Spirit’s leading.

In other words, the idea of “studying the mystics” basically is a non-starter. We do not study the mystics. We pray through them. Well, I guess if you’re taking a college course you’re studying the mystics. But even that can be handled in a prayerful way.

A Message from Bonnie Raitt

Here is a message from Bonnie Raitt (and MoveOn.org) that landed in my email inbox last night:

When Jackson Browne, Graham Nash, many other bands and I played our “No Nukes” concerts in 1979 to 100,000 people, we never dreamed we’d have to come back almost 30 years later to fight the same fight all over again.

But it’s 2007, and here we are again. The nuclear industry just slipped a clause into the energy bill that will provide up to $50 billion in tax subsidies for to build new reactors—enough to launch a whole new generation of nukes! We’ve already got the safe, viable alternatives to replace the dirty energy we’re using now. Building new atomic reactors in an age of terror threats is not only scary, but the toxic waste from nuclear power threatens our health and our planet. The nuclear option is not the way to go.

So I called my friends, and we recorded a music video to spread the word. We’ve also launched a petition, and I’m asking MoveOn members to sign on. Here’s what it says: “America’s new energy policy needs to focus on safe and economic fuel sources. Congress must strip the nuclear tax subsidies from the energy bill before they pass it.”

Clicking below will add your signature (and you can also see the video that we produced on that same page):

http://pol.moveon.org/nukefree/o.pl?id=11429-7608804-FTR_P&t=4

When you’re done, please take a minute to pass it along to your friends. $50 billion in loan guarantees is a lot of money—enough to cover financial risk for the big banks who want to get involved. In other words, if something goes wrong, it will be the American taxpayers who foot the bill, not Wall Street. It makes no sense. We know nuclear facilities are a target for terrorists. We know nuclear energy is toxic to our health and environment. And we know solar and wind power are safer, cheaper, and getting easier to use every day. This should equal a big “no” on nuclear energy, and a big “yes” to investing in clean energy. But the nuclear industry and their friends in Congress don’t want to take no for an answer.

We know MoveOn members worked to pass this energy bill and most of it is great—we’ll get more solar and wind with this bill, and even more fuel efficient cars. We just need to ask Congress to take the nuclear subsidies out.

So that’s why we’re reaching out to you. No one is better than MoveOn when it comes to mobilizing quickly on important issues. Please sign your name to the petition below and pass it along to your friends.

America’s new energy policy needs to focus on safe and economic fuel sources. Congress must strip the nuclear tax subsidies from the energy bill before they pass it.”

http://pol.moveon.org/nukefree/o.pl?id=11429-7608804-FTRo_P&t=5

Thanks for listening. Together we can find a way to a cleaner future.

–Bonnie Raitt, Musician
Thursday, October 18th, 2007

Idol Chatter

I’m having fun hanging out at Beliefnet (note to self: do this more often).

The latest treasure I’ve discovered: their “pop culture” blog, Idol Chatter.

Follow the link to check it out for yourself.

Beliefnet Community

Beliefnet has created a “community” section. It’s still in Beta, but I think for us contemplative types it just might become the best social networking site out there. I’ve already staked out my turf:

http://community.beliefnet.com/anamchara

So stop by and say hello!

Your Best Theology Now?

Over the past few months two different friends, both of whom I respect dearly, both theologically informed, liberal-minded folks, suggested I read Joel Osteen’s Your Best Life Now: 7 Steps to Living at Your Full Potential. Osteen is kind of our generation’s answer to Norman Vincent Peale, a wildly successful prosperity gospel preacher based in Texas. He’s the pastor of what I understand is America’s largest congregation, has his own TV show, etc. and this book has sold upwards of four million copies.

So I gave it a whirl. I will admit that I liked it better than I thought I would; Osteen has a sweet and engaging style and, as befits his theological niche, is relentlessly positive and encouraging. He does say some good things not only about positive thinking and remaining hopeful even when life appears to be going down the tubes, but he also has a clear sense that when we pray for (and receive) material blessings, the ultimate purpose is to give them away, to share them with others.

Still, it’s a troubling book, because of the subtle message that God’s purpose is to shower us with blessings, and that we are in charge of whether those blessings flow or not. Here it is in a nutshell: on page 269, Osteen says:

You might as well choose to be happy and enjoy your life! When you do that, not only will you feel better, but your faith will cause God to show up and work wonders in your life.

Friend, I don’t know about you, but the God I worship is a whole lot bigger than that. I believe that God will work wonders in our lives, but we don’t have to do anything to make God “show up.” God is already here. And if the wonders we are currently receiving don’t look like wonders — well, maybe it isn’t God who needs to change.

I’m all for prosperity thinking and believing in blessings. But there’s a way in which Osteen and his ilk can help us see why Augustine wasn’t entirely wrong when he attacked Pelagius.

The Shock of the Old

As readers of this blog know, I continually try to make sense of why some Christians are hostile to centering prayer.

As best I can tell, there are three basic objections:

  • It is seen as an innovation within Christian spirituality, a “new age” practice without historical precedent or grounding. A variation of this objection is that centering prayer is unscriptural; i.e. it is not found in the Bible.
  • It is seen as representing the influx of alien ideas or practices, particularly eastern forms of spirituality (an idea that no doubt was accelerated by the fact that early writings on centering prayer did borrow language and terminology freely from the east, comparing the practice to transcendental meditation and referring to the prayer word as a mantra).
  • It is seen as dangerous because an emptied mind is seen as vulnerable to attack from evil spirits.

If anyone reading this knows of other reasons why some Christians reject centering prayer, please post your thoughts as a comment here. I’m quite interested in the topic, even though it does make my blood boil (yes, evidence of my own spiritual poverty, but that’s a topic for another day).

For now, we’ll just go with these three concerns. I’m hardly a professional theologian or church historian, but based on my layman’s knowledge all three of these objections strike me as being based on misunderstandings.

Read More»

Until You Give it Away

I believe that mysticism is a lot like love. Consider these similarities:

  1. It’s a free gift from God that we can neither earn nor deserve, yet God is eager to give it to us just the same.
  2. In this gift, all God is giving us is, well, God.
  3. In receiving the gift, it’s the best feeling in the world — but it’s more than just a feeling; indeed, it is a mistake to try to reduce this gift to a mere feeling.
  4. Expanding on the above: this gift heightens our consciousness (both in temporary and long-lasting ways), energizes our ability to make positive, good, healing choices in our lives, inspires us to clean up our own mess, and nurtures all of our relationships: not only with God, but with self, others, and indeed all of creation.
  5. One of the ways we know we’ve received the gift is how it creates real, observable changes in our lives.
  6. For Christians, the power of the Sacred Scripture and the Sacraments are uniquely effective in conveying the gift to us.
  7. There is an essentially communal dimension to this gift. In other words, we never fully receive the gift until we give it away.
Read More»
© Copyright www.anamchara.com - Theme by Pexeto