Tita’s Catacomb

Google Alerts notifies me whenever a blogger mentions contemplative prayer (among several other topics I keep an eye on). This morning, it directed me to a reference to contemplation in a blog called Tita’s Catacomb: Reclaiming Sexuality and Soul. Most bloggers write about contemplative prayer either to celebrate it or condemn it, but right away I saw that this blog belonged to a category all its own. Its description pretty much says it all: “A written commentary documenting my efforts to emancipate myself from the direct control and manipulation of institutional Christianity. This is for all the truly spiritual people who, like me, have recognized what a soul killer, institutional Christianity is.” I spent about fifteen minutes scrolling through the blog. The author is either a very colorful storyteller or tragic in her wounding.

Read More»

Quote for the Day

A philosophy without theology is irrelevant, and a theology without philosophy is a more or less superstitious credulity.

— Raimon Panikkar, Christophany: The Fullness of Man

Thanksgiving

To all my USA readers, happy thanksgiving!

Thanksgiving reminds me of an old Irish festival called Lughnasa. Lughnasa (literally, “the assembly of Lugh”) was a month-long harvest festival that took place at the time of the grain harvest (probably late July or early August); it was marked not only by feasting, but also by sporting events and much pageantry. Here in America, we’ve moved our harvest festival to the end of the season (late November), but thanks to the mass media, in addition to our feast we also get plenty of sporting events (televised  football) and pageantry (the Macy’s Parade).

Of course, thanksgiving day also reminds me that whenever Christians gather to celebrate the Holy Eucharist, it’s a “thanksgiving day.” For the Greek word eucharistia means “thanksgiving.” Which means that when we participate in daily mass, it’s thanksgiving every day.

That’s the way to live.

Quotes for the Day

In Louisville, at the corner of Fourth and Walnut, in the center of the shopping district, I was suddenly overwhelmed with the realization that I loved all those people, that they were mine and I theirs, that we could not be alien to one another even though we were total strangers. It was like waking from a dream of separateness, of spurious self-isolation in a special world, the world of renunciation and supposed holiness. … This sense of liberation from an illusory difference was such a relief and such a joy to me that I almost laughed out loud. … I have the immense joy of being man, a member of a race in which God Himself became incarnate. As if the sorrows and stupidities of the human condition could overwhelm me, now I realize what we all are. And if only everybody could realize this! But it cannot be explained. There is no way of telling people that they are all walking around shining like the sun.

— Thomas Merton, Conjectures of a Guilty Bystander

Luminous beings are we.

— Yoda in The Empire Strikes Back

Spiritual Direction with Fr. Tom

Tonight I met with Father Tom Francis, OCSO, for spiritual direction. Here’s a partial (!) list of the topics we covered:

  • How the French school of devotional spirituality that began in the 16th century represents a betrayal of the mysticism of the Spanish Carmelites;
  • How Meister Eckhart’s theology of the Godhead relates to Gregory Palamas’ teaching regarding the energies and essence of God;
  • How the Rule of St. Benedict could be seen as actually undermining the wisdom of the desert fathers;
  • How postmodern theologies of the Holy Trinity might be the best hope for a widespread revival of mysticism in our day (this is a favorite topic of Fr. Tom’s, so no big suprise here);
  • How the teachings of Sri Ramana Maharshi influenced the Benedictine contemplative Henry Le Saux (aka Swami Abhishiktananda), and why these ideas are important for students of Christian mysticism today;
  • And how Neoplatonic thought weakens The Cloud of Unknowing and why The Book of Privy Counsel (by the same unknown author) may in fact represent a more pure transmission of Christian mysticism.

All this in one hour! And of course, I’ve been given two reading assignments to finish before we meet again: Christophany: The Fullness of Man by Raimon Panikkar, and Being with God: Trinity, Apophaticism, and Divine-Human Communion by Aristotle Papanikolaou.

And before you decide that I am hopelessly stuck in my head when it comes to my personal spiritual discipline, our time together included discussion both about problems in my own contemplative practice, as well as multiple reminders about the necessity to move beyond “knowing” in order to encounter the eternal love-dynamics of the Triune God. One of Fr. Tom’s favorite themes, which he hammered again and again, is how the western church has become so enamored of the intellect that our biggest obstacle to progress in the spiritual life is the seductions of the mind. All this while he is thrilling my mind with his lucid yet complex explanations of mystical theology. There you go: build up the mind and tear it down simultaneously. There must be a lesson in there somewhere.

Prayer for the Day

My Lord God, I have no idea where I am going. I do not see the road ahead of me. I cannot know for certain where it will end. Nor do I really know myself, and the fact that I think I am following your will does not mean that I am actually doing so. But I believe that the desire to please you does in fact please you. And I hope that I have that desire in all that I am doing. I hope that I will never do anything apart from that desire. And I know that if I do this you will lead me by the right road, though I may know nothing about it. Therefore I will trust you always though I may seem to be lost and in the shadow of death. I will not fear, for you are ever with me, and you will never leave me to face my perils alone.

— Thomas Merton, Thoughts in Solitude

Shane Claiborne

Last night Fran and Rhiannon and I drove up to Berry College outside of Rome, GA to hear Shane Claiborne speak. Shane is the author of a wonderful book called The Irresistible Revolution: Living as an Ordinary Radical (I’ve been meaning to write a review of it and just haven’t gotten to it yet; for now let’s just say it’s a book that belongs on your “must read” list). A leading figure in the neo-monastic movement, Shane is a co-founder of a small intentional community in Philadelphia, where he lives the gospel in the tradition of the Catholic Worker movement and the ministry of Mother Teresa (with whom we spent a summer). His book combines his life story with an insightful and accessible presentation of the gospel mandate for sharing and hospitality as core Christian virtues, with some plain old fashioned storytelling thrown in just to keep it interesting.

Shane is as fun and warm in person as he comes across on the pages of his book. With the physique of a preying mantis, horn-rimmed glasses, dreadlocks, and a goatee, he is hardly the image of a nice young white middle class evangelical. But as we discovered in his talk, his goal in life is to be — and to encourage all Christians to join him in being — the “spit’n image” of Christ. Shane explained that spit’n image is a corruption of “spirit and image,” suggesting that when one is the spit’n image of someone, they carry that person’s likeness inside as well as out.

His message basically covered the same ground as the book, keeping the audience’s attention with a down-home Tennesee accent (Shane hails from east Tennessee, not far from where we were last night) and plenty of humor. Particularly memorable is the story of his grandfather’s truck that caught fire when hauling hay one time (the story’s also in the book, so I won’t attempt to recount it here. Go buy the book!)

As someone who’s closing in on my half-century mark, it was a treat for me to hear a young man who must be barely over thirty share the gospel imperative for hospitality and restructuring our society to a chapel full of college students, here in the heart of a “red state.” It gives me hope. And part of Claiborne’s charm is that he never resorts to guilt-tripping or attacking in his efforts to get the message across. Even when, as he recounts in one memorable story (also in the book), he was arrested for distributing Holy Communion in a public park (at the time Philadelphia had an ordinance against distributing food in public), he notes how he was able to forge friends with both the police officers and the judge who presided over the case (he didn’t quite win over the prosecuting attorney; the fact that he accidentally called her the “persecutor” probably didn’t help matters).

Over the course of a sixty-minute talk and a q&a afterwards, Shane realizes he’s not going to change lives, so he kept his message upbeat and gentle. With a bible in his hand, he asks of his Christian-college audience, “What would happen if we really lived by this book?” But for me, the most brilliant moment of the evening came during the q&a, when one student asked him to comment on how Christians should approach the question of homosexuality. Here, Shane proved himself a brilliant tactician (and/or a true prophet). He never directly answered the question, knowing that to do so would mean — no matter what he said — an instant loss of credibility with a huge portion of the audience. Instead, he admits that different members of his own community hold divergent perspectives on this question. “As Christians we need to learn to disagree well,” he said. He also noted that it was important to put a human face on issues like “the gay question,” and finally that, as Billy Graham once said, it was the Holy Spirit’s job to convict, God’s job to judge, and so our job is simply to love. “We need to remember not to overstep our job description.”

Sure, I would have loved a more definitive answer from him. But to what end: so I could either applaud him or condemn him? By refusing to give me such an answer, he gave me (and everyone else there) the gift of not having to judge him — and also a glimpse of how the larger community of faith might learn to work through this and other polarizing issues.

So if Shane Claiborne comes to your home town, go hear him speak. And in the meantime, get the book, and read it. Through it, the Holy Spirit will convict you. But in a good way.

What a difference nineteen years makes

It’s fascinating to read the “Preface to the Twelfth Edition” of Evelyn Underhill’s Mysticism: The Nature and Development of Spiritual Consciousness. The first edition of Mysticism came out in 1911; the twelfth edition appeared nineteen years later. In the new preface, Underhill discusses how scholarly attitudes toward the subject of mysticism evolved in the nearly two decades since her first book came out. Now, as we approach the centenary of the book’s first publication, it’s interesting to consider what has or hasn’t changed in how we collectively understand mysticism and its role in religion and culture in general.

Underhill suggests that when she wrote the book, she was still arguing against the nineteenth century’s deterministic view of the universe. But in the space of twenty years, she no longer felt that determinism was the primary enemy of mysticism; instead, she saw monism as the new threat. It’s interesting how she responds: she suggests that the students and advocates of mystical spirituality should affirm a “limited dualism” that incorporates both matter and spirit, soul and body, God and creation, being and becoming. Underhill sees in the fashionable monism of her day a dogmatic worldview similar to what Ken Wilber some 55 years later would christen “flatland” — the disqualified universe where the transcendent is denied. But while Underhill’s perceptive analysis of the philosophical errors of those who eschew mysticism may be in some ways similar to Wilber’s perspective, she also clearly distinguishes herself (and the Christian tradition as a whole) from Wilber’s integral model when she notes that the intellectual climate of 1930 needs to be reminded of “the predominant part played in [mystical] development by the free and prevenient action of the Supernatural — in theological language, by ‘grace’ — as against all merely evolutionary or emergent theories of spiritual transcendence.” Amen! As profound and beautiful as evolutionary integral theory may be, the Christian gospel insists it is an incomplete picture of how the universe works. The missing element? The freely given gift. We do not need merely to evolve to reach heaven, even if evolution may be a joyous part of our journey there; to reach paradise, we begin by simply taking the hand lovingly outstretched to us.

Every time I read Underhill, I come away amazed at how relevant her work continues to be. Maybe I’m missing something here (and certainly she doesn’t begin to address the fascinating issues raised by postmodernity in its many permutations). She was astute enough to see a world of difference between the intellectual climates of 1911 and 1930; but in doing so, she began to explore issues that remain relevant even today.

If you are interested in Christian mysticism, please read this post

If you are interested in Christian mysticism, please go to my blog and read this post – and please answer one or more of the questions I list at the end of the post:

http://anamchara.com/2007/11/15/everything-you-always-wanted-to-know-about-christian-mysticism-but-were-afraid-to-ask/

Thank you!

Everything you always wanted to know about Christian mysticism (but were afraid to ask)

Hey you! Yes, that’s right… you, the person reading these words right now. I need your help. Don’t go away — please read this post and take a moment to respond…

Six months ago I heard a snippet of a talk Anne Lamott gave in which she encouraged writers to write the book they wish they could read. So I wrestled with this topic for a couple of days in my blog, culminating by saying this:

The book I wish I could read: a simple, practical, and sequential step-by-step manual on how to embark on the path of Christian mysticism in our day. With as much depth, erudition, and command of the tradition as Evelyn Underhill’s Mysticism.

I went on to say that such a book would be both “user-friendly and substantive” and would include “plenty of background material on the history and core teachings” of Christian mysticism.

Well, friends, I have made a commitment to write this book. And I am currently negotiating with a publisher to bring it out, probably in late 2009. Which means I have a little over a year to write the book on mysticism that I wish I could have read. Eek! (keep breathing, Carl; you can do this).

The first step on such a major project: I need your help. Since you’re reading this blog I am going to assume that you have at least a passing interest in Christian mysticism; this means you are the kind of person that this book will be written for. Now, all that matters is that you have this interest. It doesn’t matter whether you have been studying mysticism for the past 30 years, or if you just discovered the concept yesterday (in fact, I need to hear from both kinds of people!)

Basically, here’s what I want/need for you to do: please take a moment and answer one or more of the following four questions, either as a comment to this blog or via email to mccolman @ anamchara.com (you’ll have to remove the spaces to make the email work).

  • What do you think Christian mysticism is? Why do you care about Christian mysticism?
  • What topics or issues would you like to see a book on Christian mysticism address?
  • How could a book on Christian mysticism be really, really, helpful to you (so helpful that you’d want to give copies to all your friends and relatives)?
  • Have you ever read a spiritual book that you believe totally changed your life (in a good way)? If so, what book (or books) was it, and can you speak briefly about why you think this book was so life-changing for you?

Thank you.

© Copyright www.anamchara.com - Theme by Pexeto