The Quest for the Perfect (Inexpensive) Recording Gear

Yesterday I wrote about Fran’s and my experiencing recording stories for StoryCorps. We both enjoyed it so much that we’ve been talking all weekend about getting some decent recording equipment and doing more. I’d love to sit down with some of the monks in Conyers and get them to share some of their stories; although my father is pretty ravaged with dementia, on his good days he still can spin a yarn or two, and meanwhile my brother and uncle (both named Don) are pretty good at telling tales. And then there’s Fran’s side of the family…

All of this dovetails with a longstanding interest that I have had, to incorporate more media into this blog. I don’t see myself ever doing a podcast with any sense of regularity (see my musings on Discipline from earlier this month: I’m doing good enough just keeping the written part of this blog going), but I would like to create a few MP3s on select topics: maybe an introduction to Julian of Norwich, or to Benedictine Spirituality, or to lectio divina, all of which could be archived at this website and available for free download. And of course, every MP3 would begin and end with “Hi, this is Carl; visit my blog at www.anamchara.com” — so in addition to the joy of talking about my favorite things, I could do a little bit of bloggish promotion as well.

Okay, while we’re at it: ever since Patton Dodd, formerly of Beliefnet, put the bug in my ear, I’ve also thought a lot about video. I don’t know if anyone really wants to look of my grey-bearded, avuncular face; but I guess I won’t know until I try. It would be easy enough (and pretty enough) to shoot some footage by the lake at the monastery, or at the austere summit of Stone Mountain, or even in a book-cluttered corner of my own home. Again, my only commitment will be to rattle on about topics near and dear to my heart.

So, what’s stopping me? Mainly a lack of gear. I used to have a minidisc recorder and a mini-DV camcorder; both of those were taken from me when my house was burglarized the April before last. While I replaced most of the other stuff that was stolen (two computers, an ipod and sound dock, two digital camers, etc.), we never bothered to replace the recording equipment. They were both old technology, even in early 2008; and we were like many families in that we spent a tone of money on the camcorder only to use it just once or twice a year; likewise I hadn’t used hte MD recorder since my days as a Neopagan speaker/teacher had come to an end.

But now, thanks to StoryCorps and that long-simmering conversation with Patton, I’m interested in doing more recording. So: does anybody out there in blogland have any suggestions for gear I should get? Here are my parameters:

  1. I want easy. No minidiscs or video cassettes (or, for that matter, DVDs). I want to record straight to a memory card, for ease of exporting into my computer.
  2. The video recording is strictly for online use, so it doesn’t need to be super-high-quality. But the audio recording could conceivably find its way onto a CD at some point, so there I’ll be fussier for the perfect sound. The minidisc recorder was awesome in its clarity and lack of ambient hiss or hum — I used to teach classes in a bookstore where, just outside the classroom door, several fountains and windchimes hung. The recordings were crystal clear, not only of my voice, but of the soothing chimes and running water in the distance. So I want my new audio recorder to have at least that level of fidelity.
  3. Mac compatibility: I know that most equipment is, but I still need to say it.
  4. Cheap. Remember, I work for a monastery. I live simply.
  5. Portable. Obviously that’s true with the camcorder, but I need the audio equipment to be easy to carry around as well.

If you’ve had experience with recording equipment, please let me know. Comment here or email me at mccolman at anamchara dot com… and of course, I’ll also be in the market for at least two microphones: a lapel mike for the video work, and a bigger mike for the audio recording.

Thanks.

StoryCorps

Yesterday my wife and I recorded an interview with StoryCorps. Fran interviewed me. I talked about my childhood memories of religion, my spiritual awakening at age 16, my entry into and eventual disillusionment with the charismatic renewal, and my adult journey from Episcopalianism to Neopaganism to Catholicism, always with the foundational interest in Christian and world mysticism impelling me forward.

It was quite a lot of fun. StoryCorps is set up at our local public radio station, so we recorded my story using broadcast quality equipment. We were there for about an hour, and recorded for about 40 minutes. We received a CD of the talk, which I haven’t had the courage to listen to yet, but I think it will sound pretty good. All StoryCorps recordings are archived at the Library of Congress, so a copy of our session will be archived there, presumably forever. All that the good folks from StoryCorps asked from us in return was an optional $25 tax-deductible contribution. What a bargain.

I want to go back and record another session, this time with Fran as the storyteller and me as the interviewer. She certainly has some tales to tell, particularly about giving birth to, and raising, a profoundly handicapped child. But she’s not sure she wants to do this. She’s not as much of a showoff as I am!

If you live in Atlanta, StoryCorps will be here through most of 2010. I’d encourage you to set up an appointment and go tell your story. I’d love to do it again, but I won’t hog time as a storyteller — although I sure would be happy to interview others, and if my wife won’t take me up on the offer, maybe someone else will.

If you don’t live in or near Atlanta, be sure to check the StoryCorps website to see in what other cities around the nation StoryCorps recordings will be taking place. It’s such a beautiful thing: telling our stories, and listening to others tell theirs. We need more of this in our world. Hats off to the StoryCorps people for facilitating such a wonderful thing.

The “Bible in Five Statements” Meme

Angharad Wyvern AKA Yewtree over at the dance of the elements has tagged me with this impossible task. It’s called “The Bible in Five Statements” challenge:

Summarise the Bible in five statements, the first one word long, the second two, the third three, the fourth four and the last five words long. Or possibly you could do this in descending order. Tag five people.

Ay yi yi.

Okay, but only because I don’t know how to say “no” to memes, and this one, if nothing else, is quite a puzzler. And also because I’m looking forward to inflicting it on my five victims. Disclaimer: this is nothing more than a snapshot of where I happen to be at the moment. Check back with me next year, next month, next week, or even later this afternoon, and I’m sure I will come up with entirely different responses.

To summarize the Bible in five statements…

  1. Interruption
  2. God story
  3. Sacred myth evolving
  4. Transformational mystery expressed textually
  5. Western wisdom source, often misunderstood

Yewtree mused on the challenge of this exercise so eloquently that I’m just going to quote her:

What aspect of this multivalent text to focus on? The liberal or the conservative interpretation? Western Christianity or Eastern Orthodoxy? A Kabbalistic or esoteric interpretation? The Arian and Unitarian views? Changing human perceptions of the divine – from tribal thunder god to all-embracing universal consciousness? How notions of justice changed from tribal codes apparently dictated from the top of Mount Sinai towards concepts of compassion and inner conscience (starting with Micah and Amos, and later promoted by Yeshua)? Very tricky to summarise all that in 15 words…

Yup. That pretty nicely summarizes the craziness of this exercise.
So I am tagging Mike Morrell, Fencing Bear, Darrell Grizzle, Episcopalifem, and the Girl Who Cried Epiphany. But there are others I’d like to hear from, so even if you’re not on this list, please wrestle with this knotty problem and share your offerings with me, here on this blog. You all know that I’m a lame slacker when it comes to reading other peoples’ blogs, so please, post your thoughts here. I know that’s an irritating thing for me to say and an annoying request for me to make… but try to just embrace it as an interruption to your day…

The Email of Unknowing

If you want to stay connected to this website/blog without having to visit www.anamchara.com all the time, you now can get updates sent to your email inbox (okay, disclaimer: I strive to update this blog once a day, and sometimes twice a day when I’m all fired up. So that’s how often you would be receiving email). If you’re interested, look at the widgets on the left side of this site: the third one down from the top is called “The Email of Unknowing.” If you are a WordPress blogger and are signed in to your account, all you have to do is click the button and you’ll be subscribed. Otherwise, just enter your email address and www.anamchara.com will come to you.

It’s all handled by the internet gremlins and I’ll never even see your email address, so it’s not like you’re signing up to some horrible spammer who will sell your information to all the Viagra merchants of the world. No one else gets access to your information, and you will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

I also have my own email newsletter list. I don’t send out emails very often (mainly because I put my energy into this site), but I do send out anywhere from 1 – 4 messages a year (I actually sent out 6 messages in 2007, but only 3 in 2008, and only 1 so far in 2009!) I don’t know that you need to subscribe to both the blog updates and the email newsletter, but if you don’t want the barrage of updates that the blog subscription will generate, the email newsletter is a low-volume alternative. To subscribe to that, just send a message to mccolman-subscribe@yahoogroups.com.

So whadda you waiting for? Subscribe, already!  :-)

www.freerice.com

As we in America sit down to eat our Thanksgiving Day feasts, let’s bear in mind just how fortunate we are, and how so many people in the world will go hungry today.

Let us also bear in mind that feeling guilty about our wealth does not in itself achieve anything (unless it inspires us to take action in a way that can be of service to others). So the point behind remaining mindful about our blessings is not to indulge in the false pride of overweening remorse, but rather simply to spur us to make choices mindfully with an eye to helping those who lack the advantages we enjoy.

Fight World HungerAnd now, having said all that, here is a fun little website where you can participate in fairly intelligent trivia games, while supporting United Nations efforts to combat world hunger. The site is www.freerice.com and like so many other charity websites, your job is to keep loading the banners from the site’s sponsors, so that they in turn will keep paying the beneficiary — in this case, the UN’s World Food Program — for their advertising. And how do you keep the ad impressions going? By answering a variety of multiple choice questions that test your knowledge of vocabulary, grammar, mathematics, and even art history. By responding to both your correct and incorrect answers, the site will assess the strength of your vocabulary (or whatever topic you happen to be playing on) and thus continues to serve up questions that you are likely to find challenging. When you get a question wrong, not only does the site provide you with the correct answer, but it will serve up that same question again a few turns later, enabling you to get the question right the second time around (thereby reaffirming the new tidbit of knowledge you have just ingested). So it’s a great deal all the way around: it’s a fun website, it will teach you a thing or two, and using it will generate money to support the fight to end hunger.

Gotta love it.

And for all you American readers: happy thanksgiving!

Quote for the Day

The word “prayer” has often been trivialized by making it into a way of getting what you want. But… I use “prayer” as the umbrella word for any interior journeys or practices that allow you to experience faith, hope and love within yourself. It is not a technique for getting things, a pious exercise that somehow makes God happy, or a requirement for entry into heaven. It is much more like practicing heaven now.

— Richard Rohr, The Naked Now: Learning to See as the Mystics See

Prayer

I’m currently reading three books on prayer:

  • Prayer: Conversing with God by Rosalind Rinker. A classic evangelical book from the 1950s about developing greater intimacy and faith in God through unscripted, conversational prayer.
  • Praying Our Experiences by Joseph F. Schmidt. A guide to discerning the prayerful quality of all of life’s journey, including our feelings and our struggle to know and discern truth.
  • Prayerfulness by Robert J. Wicks. Prayer is not just something we do, it is an attitude of living, and this book encourages the cultivation of a mindful, prayerful way of life.

I didn’t set out to read these three books, all at the same time; it sort of happened by accident (hmmmm….). I wanted to read Prayer: Conversing with God because it is the #1 book on Christianity Today’s list of The Top 50 Books That Have Shaped Evangelicals. Meanwhile, Praying Our Experiences was an assignment from my confessor, and Prayerfulness is a review book that recently came my way. Each of these books is, by itself, an insightful guide to ways we can deepen our daily life of prayer. But taken together, they make a pretty persuasive argument for making prayer — not just meditation, not just contemplation, but just good old fashioned “Dear God” prayer — a central part of our spiritual lives.

It’s easy for those of us who read the mystics and who want to incorporate their wisdom into our lives to have a spiritual life that is skewered toward silence and away from thoughts or words offered to God. When John Ruusbroec tells us that we must leave all images behind us, or the author of The Cloud of Unknowing insists that we have to leave every created thing beneath the “cloud of forgetting,” or Louis Lallemant notes that “Contemplation is a participation in the state of glory,” it becomes just too easy to forget that the great mystics became great mystics because they built their house of contemplation on the solid foundation of prayer. It becomes a major temptation for the would-be contemplative of our time to simply short-circuit the emotional messiness of actually revealing the inner dynamics of our thinking, our values, our beliefs, our attachments, and our sin to God, through the old fashioned method of actually getting on our knees and having a chat with him. That feels so… well… childlike. Never mind that Jesus told us we would have to become like children to enter the kingdom of heaven.

Christians who are opposed to mystical and contemplative spirituality argue that mysticism leads to gnosticism, or syncretism, or pantheism. And of course, some formerly Christian mystics do end up getting lost in those kinds of quasi-Christian or non-Christian spiritualities. While it is not my purpose to judge those who consciously choose to abandon orthodox expressions of Christianity, it is my goal to promote expressions of Christian mysticism that are, and remain, thoroughly orthodox, even while they lead us to transformed consciousness, growth in holiness and love, and, hopefully, a positive and loving appreciation of the world’s great wisdom traditions. In other words, I believe it is possible to be a 100% orthodox Christian who is anchored in the faith, even while moving deeply into contemplative spirituality, which includes (among other things) relating positively and appreciatively to the great wisdom found in other contemplative paths, such as Buddhism and Vedanta. In fact, that is precisely the kind of contemplative I aspire to be. And I believe one of the keys to growing in to that kind of deeply orthodox Christian contemplation is prayer: good, old fashioned, prayer-that-consists-of-words, whether liturgical, scripted, or extemporaneous (in fact, I would argue that a “balanced prayer diet” requires both liturgical and spontaneous prayer).

Liturgical prayer: participation in the mass (or equivalent corporate gatherings for non-Catholics) and at least some part of the Liturgy of the Hours, ideally every day (that’s why they call it the “Daily Office”). Spontaneous prayer: those times when we set the book aside and, in simplicity and honesty and naked vulnerability, express to God, using words, our love for God, our gratitude for all our blessings, our sorrow for our sins, and our desires, both for ourselves and on behalf of others. It can also involve screaming at God, spewing out our anger and our rage, getting all neurotic with our confusions and obsessions and compulsions, and — eventually — breathing through our words, learning to rest in them, and finding that wonderful place where words shade off into silence.

When Guigo the Carthusian wrote about the four part process that we have come to know as lectio divina, he advocated oratio — verbal prayer — as the bridge between meditatio (reflecting on our sacred reading) and contemplatio (moving into the deeper waters of God’s silence). The whole process begins with lectio, sacred reading, which generally speaking involves reading scripture, not in an analytical, “Bible study” sense, but in a more formational, open-hearted, “what is God saying to me here?” sense. I said prayer is “one of the keys” to exploration contemplation in an orthodox manner. Immersion in Sacred Scriptures is another one of those important keys.

I personally find that prayer is more challenging to my ego than is contemplation. With contemplation I can just let the ol’ ego take a break. But it comes roaring back after the silence has ended. Prayer, meanwhile, requires all of me, ego included, to submit in a posture of humble faithfulness and trust to a God whom my ego will often regard more in deistic rather than orthodox Christian terms. In other words, my ego loves to be in control, and operates under the fiction that God is “way up there” and therefore not too involved in my little affairs; after all, God has a universe to run. Contemplation does not directly challenge that ego-aggrandizement. This is similar to Ken Wilber’s insistence that we need both psychotherapy and meditative practice, because while meditation will deepen our spiritual intelligence, it doesn’t necessarily go after our shadow issues. The Christian corollary to Wilber’s insight is that meditation/contemplation can transform us in many ways, but it doesn’t necessarily make us holy, or more faithful, or more trusting in God. But traditional prayer, engaging the ego as it does, can help us in precisely all of those areas.

So sit in silence for 20 or 40 or 60 minutes every day. But do it in the context of a life rich with prayer.

In search of the perfect Christian Jam Band

Okay, I’m on a mission.

Last night, Fran, Rhiannon and I went to see Point of Grace and Mark Schultz perform at a local mega-church. It was the second time we’ve seen Point of Grace, our first Mark Schultz concert. We went mainly for Rhiannon, who is just nuts over what she calls “Fish Music” (because the local Contemporary Christian Music, i.e. CCM, radio station is WFSH 104.7, affectionately nicknamed “the Fish”). Now, I do not mean to be a grouch when it comes to CCM; there are a few bands I truly enjoy: Switchfoot and Third Day top the list, and I was impressed with Delirious? when I saw them a couple of years back, and I can even get enthusiastic over someone as squeaky-clean as Rebecca St. James. But you know, in my opinion there are too many CCM bands that sound like U2 knockoffs, and some of the biggest names in the business (Steven Curtis Chapman, Jeremy Camp, Casting Crowns, Jars of Clay, Mercy Me) are all so honed in their midtempo rock, adult contemporary sound, that… well, it all just starts to sound the same after a while. At least to me.

Okay, I understand I’m not exactly their target demographic. I grew up listening to bands like Yes and Jefferson Airplane and Pink Floyd and Led Zeppelin and Grateful Dead. As a matter of fact, I still listen to these guys, with the main difference being that at this point in my life I wince at how sexist or violent or angry so many of their lyrics are. But these old progressive rock/jam bands made music that was (at least, for its time) risky, gutsy, edgy, and even a tad bit dangerous. Yes may have been the least scary of the lot, but even their music broke all the rules of pop radio (on their classic albums from the early 1970s, the average song length was about ten minutes).

So last night at the concert, I thought to myself, “Self, it is better to light a candle than to curse the darkness. Since Fran and Rhiannon love the pure-pop sounds of most CCM, I cannot begrudge them the music they enjoy. But if I want Christian music with an edge, I need to go find it — and its normal habitat will not be radio stations like the Fish.”

Now, in its heyday the Jesus music scene of the 70s did produce a few artists who made unusual, edgy, or just plain weird music. The Resurrection Band (later shortened to Rez Band) could be called acolytes of Led Zeppelin, and more recently their protegé band, Seeds, has a sound similar to Crosby, Stills and Nash. Larry Norman, one of the true pioneers of Christian rock, created music that combined his 50s-rock falsetto voice with a bluesy psychedelic sound (and in-your-face lyrics). Probably my single favorite Christian musician, Phil Keaggy, is a masterful guitarist and, having seen him twice over the last eighteen months, it’s reassuring to note that he still knows how to jam. Indeed, his album Crimson and Blue is probably the single best example of improvisational Christian rock that I’ve yet run across. Among younger artists, Zehnder has a jam-band sensibility, even though none of their recordings that I’ve heard seem to be particularly improvisational.

So that’s all good stuff. But I’d like to find some new Christian jam music. Does it exist?

Last night I tweeted a request for “Jerry Garcia with Jesus” music, and people both on Twitter and Facebook rose to the challenge. One person suggested I visit www.indieheaven.com, a website that invites us to “discover the other 99% of Christian music.” You can search their site by genre, and I was pleased to see that “jam band” was among the many genres listed in their search box. So I selected that category, clicked on the search button… and had 0 results.

Ouch.

The Promise of ParadoxMeanwhile, other folks threw out a variety of ideas: Jesse Manibusan, Soul-Junk, Daniel Amos, Waterdeep, among others. Meanwhile, my own Googling yielded The Selah Project, which (along with Waterdeep) seems to be the most promising. I’m beginning to think that contemporary, creative, Christian music that hasn’t been put through the corporate rock blander, er, blender, does in fact still exist out there. And I suspect that there’s more of it, but it hasn’t made it onto my radar screen yet.

So, do any of my dear readers have a favorite Christian band that’s just a little too freaky to get airtime on the big corporate radio stations? If you do, please let me know.

And I should end this post by being honest and saying that both Mark Schultz and Point of Grace put on a fine show. I don’t mean to be a nay-sayer about all the mainstream Christian musicians who I am sure work very hard at their craft and their ministry. So I want to be clear that by saying “it’s not my cuppa tea” I’m not saying “it’s lousy!” Far from it. Once again: better to light a candle than curse the music that isn’t really to my taste. But before I can light my candle, I need to find it.

Simon’s Cat

Simon’s Cat (In His Very Own Book)
By Simon Tofield
New York: Grand Central Publishing, 2009
Review by Carl McColman

The Promise of ParadoxMove over, Garfield, Dewey, LOLCats, and all those adorable cats by Kliban… here come’s “Simon’s Cat,” who insinuated himself (herself?) into my heart with a huge baseball bat. Twenty-five million Youtube fans later, Simon’s irrepressible puss has now landed a major book deal, with Simon’s Cat the first of what we can hope will be many releases. The drawings are whimsical, almost primitive, in their simple depictions of life, the universe and everything from a cat’s-eye view. Of course, everything revolves around the holy trinity of naps, playtime, and the food bowl. If you, or anyone you love, are owned by cats, you’ll find this book to be plenty of fun and dead-on accurate in its depiction of the glories of serving our four-legged masters. And I suppose I don’t need to point out that this is a wonderful holiday gift idea.

Now, if only they could figure out how to encode Youtube videos into the pages of a book (a non-Kindle-ized book, that is)…

Quote for the Day

I pray much to have a wise heart, and perhaps the rediscovery of Lady Julian of Norwich will help me. I took her book with me on a quiet walk among the cedars. She is a true theologian with greater clarity, depth and order than St. Theresa: she really elaborates, theologically, the content of her revelations. She first experienced, then thought, and the thoughtful deepening of experience worked it back into her life, deeper and deeper, until her whole life as a recluse at Norwich was simply a matter of getting completely saturated in the light she had received all at once, in the “shewings” when she thought she was about to die.

© Copyright www.anamchara.com - Theme by Pexeto