Running with Expanding Heart

Running with Expanding Heart: Meeting God in Everyday Life
By Mary Reuter, OSB
Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2010
Review by Carl McColman

Running with Expanding HeartJust in time for Lent: here is a wonderful new addition to the literature of Benedictine wisdom.

Running with Expanding Heart (the title comes from a phrase in the prologue to the Rule of Saint Benedict) offers a vision of how Benedictine spirituality can provide inspiration and guidance for twenty-first century Christians—including the laity. Sister Mary Reuter, a member of Saint Benedict’s Monastery in St. Joseph, Minnesota and a theology professor at the College of Saint Benedict and Saint John’s University, understands just how down-to-earth and practical Benedictine wisdom is, and uses storytelling, personal reflection, and thought-provoking, open-ended questions to illustrate just how relevant Benedict’s Rule continues to be. Beginning with an homage to her father whom she describes as an “extraordinary ordinary man,” the author goes on to show, in a variety of ways, how Benedictine wisdom can help Christians to find the extraordinary in all of life’s ordinary moments.

The chapters of the book cover the key elements of Benedictine wisdom, including hospitality, stability, obedience, the beauty of the ordinary, the spirituality of place, and the recognition that everything is holy. Although the book does not promote any sort of method or technique of prayer, the overall message will support all who seek to nurture a contemplative dimension within even the most down-to-earth corners of their lives.

This book can serve as an introduction to Benedictine spirituality for beginners, but also as a bouquet of new insights for those who have walked with Benedict for some time. It’s a slender little book (100 pages plus notes), making it ideal to read as part of an overall discipline of daily devotion. St. Benedict expected his monks to read a book for Lent; if you want to make Benedictine wisdom more integrally part of your life, this would be an ideal selection for your Lenten reading.

Quote for the Day

The vision of the splendor of creation, like all kinds, lays a duty upon one who has been fortunate enough to receive it, a duty in his turn to create works which are as worthy of what he has seen as his feeble capacities will permit. And many have listened and obeyed. It has been, I am quite certain, the initial cause of all genuine works of art and, I believe, of all genuine scientific inquiry and discovery for it is the wonder which is, as Plato said, the beginning of every kind of philosophy.

— W. H. Auden, “Introduction to The Protestant Mystics
anthologized in Forewords and Afterwords

Snuggling with Clarissa

Clarissa, who came to live with us in 1999, is now our “senior” cat. She has always been very sweet-tempered, affectionate, and particularly kind with Rhiannon (when she was younger she used to hop onto Rhiannon’s wheelchair and ride around with her, something none of our other cats have ever done). Since we lost our eldest cat, Julian, in 2007, Clarissa has become increasingly bonded with Fran, and often crawls onto Fran as she rests in bed.

The other day Clarissa did just that, but also did something I had never seen before — she snuggled up to Fran, practically cheek to cheek. I grabbed my phone and snapped this picture.

Fran and Clarissa, 2/13/10

Cats are such wonderful creatures. We who are privileged to live with them should be humbly grateful.

The Naked Now

The Naked Now: Learning to See as the Mystics See
By Richard Rohr
New York: Crossroad, 2009
Review by Carl McColman

The Promise of Paradox

Many of the finest studies of Christian mysticism are just that: studies. While authors as renowned as William Ralph Inge, Cuthbert Butler, Evelyn Underhill, Louis Bouyer, John Macquarrie, Bernard McGinn and Robert Davis Hughes have made splendid contributions to our knowledge and understanding of contemplative and mystical spirituality, their erudite and scholarly works are, alas, often just too challenging for the ordinary, non-theologically-educated layperson. Although perusing their work can be a dazzling journey of insight and cognition, the casual reader may well be left wondering the all-important question, largely unaddressed by the scholars: “How do I apply this wisdom to my life?”

Enter Richard Rohr and his inviting, accessible introduction to the mystical element of spirituality written for the average seeker in our time. He understands that mysticism is far more than just “experiencing God,” and he refuses to reduce contemplation to mere psychological nurture or stress management. He deftly understands that mysticism often exists in tension with established religious authority, and yet at its heart Christian mysticism is about reconciliation and relationship more so than revolution and rebellion. Rohr has a clear sense of the paradox and play at the heart of mysticism, and manages to avoid both the trap of esotericism (mysticism as a retreat into private spirituality) and devotionalism (mysticism as a metaphor for super-piety). The title, The Naked Now, evokes a range of “present-moment” spiritaul masterpieces, from Eckhart Tolle’s The Power of Now to Jean-Pierre de Caussade’s Abandonment to Divine Providence. Like these previous works, The Naked Now recognizes the mysticism is a gift already given, not something we achieve so much as something we, by God’s grace, simply allow: in the undefended, un-judged (hence, “naked”) here-and-now present.

The key to this book’s accessibility and usefulness lies in its subtitle. Rohr does not promise his readers that The Naked Now will make them become mystics; instead, he promises to invite them to “see” as mystics do. He uses the metaphor of seeing and even of the “third eye” to unpack not only what is wrong with religion in general, but to present mysticism as a shift into all-embracing, nondual consciousness. He grounds this fundamental truth in the Christian tradition, discussing how mysticism relates to the Christian (particularly but not exclusively Catholic) life, and especially to the teachings of Jesus. Like Cynthia Bourgeault or even Ken Wilber, Rohr’s understanding of Jesus liberates Christ from the kind of metaphysical superhero who dies to placate a wrathful God and instead celebrates him as a wisdom teacher whose death and resurrection become the archetypal pathway for the life of mystical initiation: descent into the dark night (and surrender of the ego), followed by the resurrection into the “new mind” or “mind of Christ” (metanoia, conversion) that characterizes mystical seeing — and being.

In his introduction to the book, Rohr suggests that these principles epitomize what he is trying to say: “All saying must be balanced by unsaying, and knowing must be humbled by unknowing,” and “All light must be informed by darkness, and all success by suffering.” The key to these mystical axioms, of course, is unlearning the dualistic way of seeing and thinking by relaxing into the naked now: the “sacrament of the present moment.”

The Naked Now is a gentle book, and probably will not convert anyone who is not already predisposed to its joyful and expansive message. It lacks the polemical punch of Brian McLaren’s A New Kind of Christianity or Phyllis Tickle’s The Great Emergence; but it really has a different mission than either of those books. It’s not about convincing the ego of how “right” the mystical path is, but rather simply about accepting the invitation to walk the mystic path and see for yourself. Because Rohr is not interested in oppositional consciousness, so he is not particularly interested in meeting his critics (or the critics of mysticism in general) on their level. Rather, he simply invites everyone to “come higher” to the third-eye, naked now level of contemplative seeing. Those who accept the invitation will find this book encouraging and hopeful. Those who don’t probably wouldn’t read the book to begin with.

If you like The Website of Unknowing I can confidently say that you will love The Naked Now. If you’re not particularly familiar with my website, then consider if you are drawn to centering prayer, interfaith spirituality (Christianity in dialogue with Buddhism, etc.), Benedictine/Monastic spirituality, Celtic Christianity, or the emergent conversation. If any of these are of interest to you, get this book. It will inspire you to connect to the spiritual heart of all these creative movements within the Christian community.

Advice for a Beginner

A reader posted these questions to my blog this morning:

As a novice to Contemplative Prayer I guess I should take the introduction pace . Any suggestions ? Also, Carl, do you consider Henri Nouwen a mystic?

I’ll answer your second question first. I certainly have the sense of Henri Nouwen as a contemplative, based on what I know of him and his work. As you may have surmised if you’ve poked around this blog very much, though, I tend to be reticent about applying the word “mystic” to people (and especially to myself!), unless of course they are widely acknowledged in the tradition to be mystics (Julian of Norwich, Teresa of Avila, etc.). Having said, that, like Karl Rahner I do believe the call to be a Christian is in fact the call to be a mystic, and I believe that to be a sinner (which we all are) means to resist that mystical call. John Lennon once said, “We are all Christ and we are all Hitler.” That, it seems to me, pretty much sums up how I feel about whether any one person deserves to be called a “mystic” or not. So was Nouwen a mystic? I suppose I could say “of course he was.” But I bet as a consequence of his own humility he would have been uncomfortable with the label. Read C.S. Lewis’ Letter to Malcolm in which he vigorously disclaims being a mystic himself. Then read Till We Have Faces or The Voyage of the Dawn Treader and it becomes obvious that C.S. Lewis certainly could, to use Richard Rohr’s wonderful language, “see like the mystics see.” Somehow I suspect that the same could be said of Nouwen.

Now, then; as for suggestions to an aspiring contemplative, here a few thoughts for you to ponder…

  1. Be involved in some form of Christian community. If you are allergic to traditional “church,” then at least find a theology on tap group, or a centering prayer group, or a house church, emergent group, some setting where people who are struggling to be disciples of Jesus come together for mutual support, encouragement, and prayer. This, I believe, is truly essential, and will probably be the most controversial thing I say in my forthcoming book.
  2. Find a monastery, or failing that a cathedral close or even a beautiful park where it is possible to spend time just being silent. Make it a habit to go there, not just to pray, or attend a workshop, or read a book, but to just be.
  3. If you don’t know what lectio divina is, find out. And start to do it, ideally every day, but failing that at least a few times a week. Use the Bible, but also use the writings of the classic mystics, for your lectio practice.
  4. If you do not currently have a prayer life, then get one. You can start out small: grace before meals, and a check-in with God first thing in the morning and before retiring at night. Such prayers can be formal (“Now I lay me down to sleep”), or better yet, in your own words. The point is to begin to cultivate your own commitment to recognizing God’s silent presence in your life on an on-going basis. To do that, you need to let God know that your desire for him is greater than your resistance to him. If you’re ambitious, you can take on a more disciplined form of prayer such as the Rosary or the Daily Office. But for a beginner, just making sure that you are praying every day, no matter how briefly, is the important first step.
  5. When you’ve got all of the above down, then — and only then — do I recommend beginning to drink from the well of silent prayer. Of course, if you’re doing #2 and practicing lectio, then you’re already befriending silence, but this step is about moving further into the actual practice of contemplative prayer. Technique is not strictly necessary, but for guidance in how to “do” silent prayer, I recommend The Cloud of Unknowingthe link takes you to the wonderful new translation by Carmen Butcher. As for how long: the best advice I can give is, do it every day! Better to do five minutes a day than a half hour once a week. The point is to make it as embedded in your life as brushing your teeth. So start out small, but regularly. As for a goal, eventually I’d agree with the centering prayer folks and say that 20 minutes a day, twice a day, is plenty. If you feel called to do more, discuss it with a spiritual director, which leads to my next point:
  6. Find a spiritual director or a soul friend. This person does not need to be a “contemplative” or a “mystic” him- or herself, and frankly, I would tend to trust more those who talk less about their own spiritual experience! The key to a good spiritual director is humility, love, and their own fervent desire to follow Christ. Think of your soul friend or spiritual director as a trusted uncle or aunt, older brother or sister, who you know is just trying to get through life like you are, but because they are a bit older and wiser they can offer advice, encouragement, and occasionally a kick in the pants. Check with your local monastery or centering prayer community to find qualified spiritual directors, or visit www.sdiworld.org. Incidentally, the URL of this blog, “anamchara,” comes from the Irish word for “soul friend.” That should give you a hint as to how important I consider this practice.
  7. Finally, perhaps most important of all: strive to live according to the “five H’s”: humility, humor, hospitality, holiness, and heaven-consciousness. If your spiritual practice is filling you with pride or a sense of self-importance, then something is off-kilter. It’s really about becoming more down-to-earth and self-forgetful (in healthy ways); also the ability to laugh is crucial (including the all-important ability to laugh gently at your own foibles!). Hospitality is so important: learning to welcome the stranger in your life, those who do not share your own mystical or contemplative aspirations, those whose lives are broken or wounded, those of whom you do not ‘approve,’ etc. Remember Abraham and the three angels who came calling, or the story of the Good Samaritan. Hospitality is a central value in the Rule of St. Benedict. You’ll also struggle to offer hospitality to God as God becomes increasingly present in your life, and — most difficult of all — learning even to be welcoming to your own imperfections (even as you continually turn away from your sin in joyful penitence). Loving yourself is, frankly, one of the hardest assignments you’ll have as a contemplative! But this leads to the important task of growth in holiness. This means more than just going to church all the time and reciting tons of prayers every day. It’s not about “purity” in some sort of Platonic sense, but rather about love: to be holy is to be loving, in a trinitarian way: love God, love others, love yourself. And this leads to the summit of the contemplative life: heaven-consciousness. Paul confidently proclaimed “we have the mind of Christ” (I Corinthians 2:16). What is that? I believe it is the mind of non-dual consciousness, the mind that loves like God loves, lavishly, indiscriminately, joyfully, delightfully, humbly, confidently, serenely. The mind of Christ is the consciousness of heaven. If we take Paul at his word, this is not just some sort of bonbon reserved for us after we die: it is a gift available to us now, for the purpose of supporting us in the task of holiness (of love).

I hope these thoughts are helpful. As for pacing, that’s where humility kicks in. You don’t have to have it all figured out tonight, tomorrow, or next month. We are like babies, learning to crawl. Yes, we want to walk and run, and we will get there, eventually. But it’s important to be gentle with ourselves, for change takes time. First things first, in patience and confidence and joyful awareness of the gifts of each precious, present moment.

So there you go!

More Thoughts for a Small Contemplative Community

First of all, I’m really pleased at all the wonderful ideas and expressions of support for the idea I blogged about yesterday. I don’t think I have it in me to start a network of contemplative groups throughout metro Atlanta, though! Besides, Contemplative Outreach has already done that. I’d rather start small and see where the Spirit takes us from there.

Here’s just another thought or two that came to me yesterday, after I made the initial post.

While I’m really interested in having a group read through the writings of the mystics together, I’m also aware that some attention the Scripture would need to be part of this experience. Here’s what I’m curious about: can we find some sort of middle ground between the purely affective experience of group lectio and the more traditionally academic methodology of “Bible study”? Put another way: is it possible to read the Bible for both discipleship and contemplative formation, simultaneously? Obviously, like any hybrid, this approach would have its own weaknesses, but I think for the purposes of this particular group, trying to bridge both the “theory” and the “practice” of contemplative spirituality, such an approach might prove deeply rewarding.

Two thoughts along this line. First, for the Gospel of John, I know of at least three commentaries that approach the Gospel from an explicitly contemplative/mystical orientation:

Meanwhile, Phil mentioned the Song of Songs, where the mystical commentaries are even richer:

Back in 2006 I published an even longer list of commentaries on the Song of Songs.

So would it be too much for a regular gathering of folks who would commit to a “lectio continua” reading of about 1 chapter a week of a Biblical text (like John or the Song of Songs), along with about 10-15 pages a week of a classic writing by a great mystic (Merton, Julian, Eckhart, Teresa of Avila, et al.)? This means the group, over the course of a 90 minute meeting, would A) check in; B) reflect on the scripture reading for the week; C) discuss the writing of the mystic assigned for the week, which would lead to D) time for group spiritual direction, culminating in E) silence and F) compline and/or time for shared vocal prayer.

Is that too much?

And for those of you who live in Atlanta: how does Wednesday evenings sound?

Prospectus for a Small Contemplative Community

When I was a young man, I took a class at the Shalem Institute on leading contemplative prayer groups. I’ve had several opportunities to lead groups devoted to meditation and/or contemplative prayer over the years, and I’ve always enjoyed participating in that kind of a communal setting. The other evening I had a conversation with my friend Phil who is the associate minister for spiritual development at a Protestant church near me. As part of his ministry there, he leads a wonderful group that meets weekly to engage in communal lectio divina — over the course of 90 minutes the group reads together the lessons and the Psalm from the common lectionary for the coming Sunday, and then each person reflects on which of the lessons they feel drawn to, which word or phrase in that lesson seems to be speaking to them, and what their sense of God’s call is for them in the lesson. Their time together is completed with 20 minutes of shared silence.

My friend mentioned that while the group is thriving, there seems to be a growing need for more interaction among the members, particularly in regard to their spiritual practice. He thought that this could signal the need for a new, or at least differently formatted, group, to meet in addition to the lectio group.

This conversation resonated with me because it touched a dream I’ve had for a while: to create a group that met regularly, either weekly or bi-weekly, that would combine shared silence, communal prayer, and the study and reflection of the writings of the mystics. Basically, such a group would be an experiment exploring this question: can lay Christians in our time support one another in their contemplative practice, drawing on the wisdom of the mystics of old? I think the answer to such a question must be ‘yes’ or else I wouldn’t be thinking about this at all. But as to how such a small group would work—that’s the interesting question.

It seems to me that such a group would almost have to be ecumenical in nature, for no one parish or congregation could provide enough people to make such a group viable. The reality is, most people drawn to contemplative spirituality are not necessarily drawn to a small group setting for interpersonal spiritual growth — and vice versa. To find 10-15 people who would want to read the mystics, and engage in a practice of daily prayer, and who would commit to meet 2-4 times a month with others engaged in a similar practice, I think it would be necessary to draw on the entire spectrum of Christian communities.

I know that the emergents in Cobb County (northwest of Atlanta) have a book discussion group called the “Group of Unknowing” that meets regularly. I haven’t participated in that simply because of the distance (from where I work to where they meet is about 45 miles). I’m curious to hear from anyone who reads this blog who might be involved in a centering prayer group, or some other small-group forum dedicated to the practice of contemplative Christian spirituality. I’m also curious to know if folks from the Decatur and East/Northeast regions of Atlanta would be interested in helping to create such a forum. I can’t commit to something like this indefinitely (people who know me will testify that when I get involved in a book project, other commitments tend to take a backseat!), but I think setting up a group that met for three to six months might be really valuable for all its participants.

Any thoughts?

Quote for the Day

Is God violent? Nearly all religions—and certainly all monotheistic religions—seem at times hell-bent on inspiring people to kill each other, making atheism sometimes seem a more ethical alternative to conventional violence-prone belief. So we ask: Why does God seem so violent and genocidal in many Bible passages? Does God play favorites? Does God choose some and reject others? Does God sanction elitism, prejudice, violence, or even genocide? Is God incurably violent and is faith capable of becoming a stronger force for peace and reconciliation than it has been for violence in the past?

— Brian McLaren, A New Kind of Christianity: Ten Questions
That Are Transforming the Faith

Snow in Atlanta

Okay, I know this is a tremendously boring picture, especially for everyone who lives in the north and who is dealing with three feet rather than three inches of snow. But, snow is such a rarity in Atlanta that I’m indulging myself and posting a picture I just took a couple of minutes ago outside our front door.

Quote for the Day

The great mystics are the paradigms and the amplifiers of a life of deep faith, hope, and love. They help us to hear the interior whispers and to see the faint flickers of truth and love in ourselves and others. By looking at their lives, we can frequently discover the obstacle in us to fully authentic human life. Looking into the lives of the great mystics will help to locate the compass of our hearts, to see what authentic human living is, and what our final purification, illumination, and transformation entail.

— Harvey D. Egan, SJ, What Are They Saying About Mysticism?

© Copyright www.anamchara.com - Theme by Pexeto